Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has consolidated her place as the front-runner in the contest for the Democratic presidential nomination, outpacing her main rivals in fundraising in the most recent quarter and widening her lead in a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
For the first time, Clinton (N.Y.) is drawing support from a majority of Democrats -- and has opened up a lead of 33 percentage points over Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.). Her popularity, the poll suggests, is being driven by her strength on key issues and a growing perception among voters that she would best represent change. Read on @ Washington Post
6 comments:
This picture reminds me of when Derek Newsom beat Alex Bourne by .01 seconds for state title in the 100 (the picture was in the paper for those of you who saw it). I do have to admit that Hillary is doing a good job getting her name out there, including the help of he sleazebag husband. The only change Hillary wants is socialism where no matter how hard you work, your equal to the one who doesn’t even work or try hard. Where education and entrepreneurialism means nothing. Her lesson is for those who work hard get the same as those who don’t work, there would be not point everyone would stop working hard (hint of minute exaggeration). In the wise words of Lucas Bentz “Hillary = Communism, and no body wants communism.”
haha, yes mitch, "minute".
"and a growing perception among voters that she would best represent change."
and do most voters know what that change would entitle?
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
well starting with medical care being provided by the government, once Americans get free stuff from the gov. we will want more and more leading to government feeding us everything called socialism.
Yeah, cause feeding/caring for the poor is so terrible. Maybe we should spend our tax dollars on resurrecting Reagan so we can screw the 'em over again.
poor, did i mention that helping the needy is a bad thing because if i ever did that must have been a mistake. I'm all for helping legal American citizens who are in need. Where did feeding come about must have missed that part. Socialism is the government in control handing out well i guess the term rations could be used everybody is equal, you don't gain from person success, businesses would close because why work hard to make a living when everyone is equal and the government will provide for you. Socialism discourages independent success, dedication, integrity. Why spend time working when everything will be giving to you. Specially those who don't like our government (and the government in the past has proven the aren't the best to handle certain situation) so you would want them handling and control every part of your life? Tell you what to eat and how much?
"
Casey said...
Yeah, cause feeding/caring for the poor is so terrible. Maybe we should spend our tax dollars on resurrecting Reagan so we can screw the 'em over again.
"
did you ever here about the USSR? and how that failed miserably, trying to do just that initially? socialism is a real great idea, too bad no one has yet to figure it out truly, and i can guarantee that americans won't be the ones to do it.
Post a Comment